Thursday, April 24, 2025
Times of Georgia
HomePoliticalWatchdog Warns Of Reputational Damage From Failure To Meet Treaty Settlement Obligations

Watchdog Warns Of Reputational Damage From Failure To Meet Treaty Settlement Obligations



Russell
Palmer
, Political Reporter

The
Auditor-General has criticised the public sector over a lack
of planning, monitoring and accountability for keeping to
commitments laid down in Treaty settlement laws.

John
Ryan found “many public organisations do not properly plan
how they will meet their commitments, nor do they prioritise
sufficient resources to do so. Many do not have effective
processes for monitoring whether they are meeting their
commitments”.

He pointed to He Korowai Whakamana, a
Cabinet-approved framework aimed at strengthening oversight
and monitoring for Treaty settlements, saying it had
improved transparency and helped identify and resolve issues
with providing redress.

But despite some “isolated
examples of good practise”, public organisations audited
were “not yet consistently meeting their commitments or
supporting settlements’ overall intent”.

This would
deny opportunities to post-settlement groups, and the
reputational damage could make it harder for the public
sector to achieve the intent of settlements and improve the
relationship with iwi and hapū.

He pointed to a lack
of accountability and monitoring, saying it was
“unacceptable that public organisations have not fully
appreciated Treaty settlements’ complexity or adequately
recognised the importance of meeting their commitments
consistently and promptly”, and warning that over many years
a tolerance of that lack had built up.

Advertisement – scroll to continue reading

Ryan also noted
the number of settlements had effectively doubled each
decade between 1989 and 2020, “and this has increased the
volume and complexity of public organisations’
responsibilities”.

“Today, about 150 public
organisations have about 12,000 individual contractual and
legal commitments under about 80 settlements with about 70
groups. To date, $2.738 billion of financial and commercial
redress has been transferred through settlements.”

He
made nine recommendations to improve the sector
response:

  • Te Puni Kōkiri, working with other
    public organisations as appropriate, develop a framework to
    guide public organisations to achieve settlements’ holistic
    intent
  • All public organisations with settlement
    commitments review how they plan to meet and monitor their
    commitments
  • Responsible Ministers, the Public
    Service Commission, and the governing bodies of Crown
    entities, local authorities, and other non-core Crown
    agencies with settlement commitments strengthen expectations
    on public organisations about meeting their commitments in
    performance agreements with chief executives and in other
    relevant mechanisms
  • Land Information New Zealand
    works to ensure that there is a system in place so that
    right of first refusal memorials are correctly placed on
    land titles
  • The Public Service Commission and the
    governing bodies of Crown entities, local authorities, and
    other non-core Crown agencies strengthen ongoing development
    for chief executives so that they can lead their
    organisations to effectively meet settlement
    commitments
  • Te Puni Kōkiri consider improvements to
    the quality and accuracy of the information that Te Haeata
    collects and reports
  • All public organisations with
    settlement commitments improve the information that their
    annual reports provide about their progress in meeting their
    commitments, including by clearly explaining:
  • Te
    Puni Kōkiri and the Public Service Commission work
    together, and with others as needed, to consider how to
    extend He Korowai Whakamana to relevant Crown entities,
    local authorities, and other non-core Crown agencies, to
    ensure that:
  • Te Puni Kōkiri regularly assess the
    public sector’s progress with meeting settlement
    commitments, whether it is achieving each settlement’s
    holistic intention, and any significant risks and
    achievements, and:

– regularly report that
assessment to the Minister for Māori Crown Relations and
other responsible Ministers; and

– report on those
matters annually to the Māori Affairs Select
Committee

© Scoop Media

 



Source link

- Advertisment -
Times of Georgia

Most Popular