Russell
Palmer, Political Reporter

The
Auditor-General has criticised the public sector over a lack
of planning, monitoring and accountability for keeping to
commitments laid down in Treaty settlement laws.
John
Ryan found “many public organisations do not properly plan
how they will meet their commitments, nor do they prioritise
sufficient resources to do so. Many do not have effective
processes for monitoring whether they are meeting their
commitments”.
He pointed to He Korowai Whakamana, a
Cabinet-approved framework aimed at strengthening oversight
and monitoring for Treaty settlements, saying it had
improved transparency and helped identify and resolve issues
with providing redress.
But despite some “isolated
examples of good practise”, public organisations audited
were “not yet consistently meeting their commitments or
supporting settlements’ overall intent”.
This would
deny opportunities to post-settlement groups, and the
reputational damage could make it harder for the public
sector to achieve the intent of settlements and improve the
relationship with iwi and hapū.
He pointed to a lack
of accountability and monitoring, saying it was
“unacceptable that public organisations have not fully
appreciated Treaty settlements’ complexity or adequately
recognised the importance of meeting their commitments
consistently and promptly”, and warning that over many years
a tolerance of that lack had built up.
Advertisement – scroll to continue reading
Ryan also noted
the number of settlements had effectively doubled each
decade between 1989 and 2020, “and this has increased the
volume and complexity of public organisations’
responsibilities”.
“Today, about 150 public
organisations have about 12,000 individual contractual and
legal commitments under about 80 settlements with about 70
groups. To date, $2.738 billion of financial and commercial
redress has been transferred through settlements.”
He
made nine recommendations to improve the sector
response:
- Te Puni Kōkiri, working with other
public organisations as appropriate, develop a framework to
guide public organisations to achieve settlements’ holistic
intent - All public organisations with settlement
commitments review how they plan to meet and monitor their
commitments - Responsible Ministers, the Public
Service Commission, and the governing bodies of Crown
entities, local authorities, and other non-core Crown
agencies with settlement commitments strengthen expectations
on public organisations about meeting their commitments in
performance agreements with chief executives and in other
relevant mechanisms - Land Information New Zealand
works to ensure that there is a system in place so that
right of first refusal memorials are correctly placed on
land titles - The Public Service Commission and the
governing bodies of Crown entities, local authorities, and
other non-core Crown agencies strengthen ongoing development
for chief executives so that they can lead their
organisations to effectively meet settlement
commitments - Te Puni Kōkiri consider improvements to
the quality and accuracy of the information that Te Haeata
collects and reports - All public organisations with
settlement commitments improve the information that their
annual reports provide about their progress in meeting their
commitments, including by clearly explaining: - Te
Puni Kōkiri and the Public Service Commission work
together, and with others as needed, to consider how to
extend He Korowai Whakamana to relevant Crown entities,
local authorities, and other non-core Crown agencies, to
ensure that: - Te Puni Kōkiri regularly assess the
public sector’s progress with meeting settlement
commitments, whether it is achieving each settlement’s
holistic intention, and any significant risks and
achievements, and:
– regularly report that
assessment to the Minister for Māori Crown Relations and
other responsible Ministers; and
– report on those
matters annually to the Māori Affairs Select
Committee